🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.