🔗 Share this article

Last year, actor Jude Law remarked he had no concerns about backlash for playing the Russian leader in a new film. This production, though, could coincide so closely with the mythologized version promoted by Russian state media that, domestically, it functions as a endorsement rather than a challenge.

The Crafted Superhero

For years, the Kremlin and its pop-culture machine have collaborated to craft a tailor-made version of Putin. This character is a political superhero without age or mistakes, an ex-intelligence officer reimagined as a local 007 who always knows more than he reveals.

“In Russia, the constructed Putin has long overshadowed the real one.”

Screen-Based Support

One recent example is a TV series released last fall, directed by a pro-government filmmaker. The protagonist is a fictional security officer selected by fate to “save” the nation from disorder. Although he is called Mikhail, the implication is unmistakable: the hero must be a familiar security officer.

International depictions often end up reinforcing this same narrative instead of debunking it. A new film based on a bestselling satirical novel sets out to subvert the leader's mythology by framing him as a symptom but as a consequence, moving the narrative weight to the spin doctors surrounding him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

In the film, Putin is shown as having been picked by influential figures to steady the country because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. They visit him and practically plead him to become president. He replies is that he would rather govern from the shadows, seeking enduring influence.

This narrative is the Kremlin’s export myth: the cool, reluctant strategist guided by fate. Historically, these events ever happened.

The Truth Behind the Selection

No one ever begged Putin to accept the role. The position was effectively a casting call with many candidates. At the centre to this process stood a powerful businessman from the previous administration who planned to control the country de facto.

• His list featured several politicians, including an opposition leader subsequently assassinated and a security service director.
• Per an expert who studied Putin’s biography, the future president simply fitted the necessary criteria: loyal, from the security services, and politically neutral.
• A property developer close to the events stated the primary requirement was manageability and faithfulness, not leadership.

“They didn’t need a powerful leader, they needed someone malleable, someone who would follow instructions.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Experts agree that the image of Putin as a powerful KGB spy was built after the fact. Stories about his clandestine activities in Dresden fall apart under examination. Fundamentally, he was an administrator and routine duties, a low-level clerk not involved with field operations.

Curiously, the move to depicting him as a “007” could partly have been inspired by Daniel Craig’s arrival as 007. The grittier version led Russian media and online audiences to make comparisons with their leader. Edited images replacing Craig’s face with Putin’s appeared on Moscow streets, feeding the increasing trend to see him as a local secret agent.

A Propaganda Win?

With Jude Law, an star well-liked by Russian audiences, the authorities will not miss the opportunity to portray this choice as a small victory. Its exclusion of mass protests, the opposition, or prominent activists from its narrative, even though it includes the past decade, is a welcome aspect for state propaganda.

In Russian cinema, the president is frequently an all-powerful presence who never appears on screen. He is signaled through portraits or calls “from above”. Now, he finally acquires a recognizable face—one that could unintentionally echo the exact legends it perhaps aims to examine.